USPTO serial 86189152
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Schultz
George R. Schultz Schultz & Associates, P.C.5400 LBJ FreewaySuite 1200Dallas, TX 75240| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for processing digital music files; computer software and firmware for downloading and organizing music files or authenticating user identification; computer software featuring musical sound recordings and musical video recordings; digital music downloadable from the Internet; downloadable ring tones, music, or audio files via the Internet and wireless devices; downloadable MP3 files, MP3 recordings, on-line discussion board posts, webcasts, webinars and podcasts featuring music, audio books featuring popular music, artists, current events and news broadcasts; downloadable music files; downloadable musical sound recordings; downloadable ring tones, graphics and music via a global computer network and wireless devices; musical recordings; musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; series of musical sound recordings; video recordings featuring popular music, artists and current events | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps; hooded sweatshirts; technological apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, uniforms; bandanas; baseball caps and hats; belts; shoes; t-shirts; children's apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets and hats; undergarments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |