USPTO serial 86189260
BLU REEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLU REEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Issy-Les-Moulineaux, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Visser
MICHELLE L. VISSER RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software to provide an integrated and automated, end to end, digital workflow solution in the field of filmmaking and other entertainment services, from script development, pre-production, production, post production, theatrical and consumer distribution to archival, and enabling customer/partner participation and collaboration throughout the development process, as well as providing for the acquisition and/or development of components to provide solutions as appropriate, such software having a single portal view and being accessible via a digital platform | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services in the field of filmmaking and entertainment; providing access to a computer network; diffusion of information by electronic means and data transmission networks, in particular for global telecommunications networks such as the internet or private or restricted access networks via multiuser platforms; transfer, migration, distribution of content (video, data and/or voice); management of the digital distribution and storage of content via a multiuser platform; communications between computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing a computer software service for an integrated and automated, end to end, digital workflow solution in the field of filmmaking and other entertainment services, from script development, pre-production, production, post production, theatrical and consumer distribution to archival, such service enabling customer/partner participation and collaboration throughout the development process; providing a computer software service for the acquisition and/or development of components to provide solutions as appropriate; providing a computer platform for use by partners in the filmmaking process and other entertainment services to ensure a digital workflow solution | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |