USPTO serial 86191331
OBEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OBEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KARLSKRONA, SE
KARLSKRONA, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
JOHN A. CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Fireproofing preparations; flame proofing chemicals; fire retardant chemical additives for resins; fire retardant chemical additives for plastics; fireproofing chemical preparations; fire retardant compositions for commercial and domestic use; chemical preparations for use in the control of fires; chemical preparations for use in the prevention of fires; chemical preparations for use in providing fire retarding properties; fire-extinguishing compositions, in particular fire-extinguishing foams | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Cable and pipe penetration sealing collars made from metal for fireproofing; plugs and stoppers of metal for fireproofing purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Cable and pipe penetration seals, namely, fireproofing products in different shapes made of intumescent material; articles and materials for fireproofing purposes, namely, fireproofing products in different shapes made of intumescent material; non-metal seals for use in fireproofing; fire resistant expansion seals, namely, fireproofing products in different shapes made of intumescent material; plugs and stoppers of fireproofing products in different shapes made of intumescent material for fireproofing purposes; fire resisting plates, plates made of made of intumescent material for fireproofing purposes; fire resistant panels made of intumescent material; expanding pillows for the prevention of fire penetration comprised of intumescent material | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Fireproof tiles for use in building; Fire resistant non-metal expansion seals for floors and walls for use in building; Cable and pipe penetration seals with intumescent material made for walls and floors; fire resistant non-metal collars for pipes; fireproof seals in intumescent material in the nature of building materials for use in walls and floors; non-metal fire protection screenings for electric cables; non-metal fire protection screenings for electric ducts in building construction; non-metal fire protection materials for use in building, namely, intumescent material; non-metal fire resistant panels for use in building; plugs and stoppers for fireproofing purposes, namely, stoppers to seal cable and pipe penetrations from fire | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roxtec AB
- Other trademarks owned by Roxtec AB
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named OBEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |