Drawing for CEVT

USPTO serial 86191671

CEVT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEVT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Fredlake

Keith D. Fredlake KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP607 14th Street, NW , Suite 900Washington, DC 20005-2018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012automobiles; gear boxes for land vehicles; electric vehicles, namely, electric land vehicles; motors for land vehicles; anti-theft devices for vehicles; tires for vehicle wheels; bodies for vehicles; motorcycles; vehicles for locomotion by land, air, water or railACTIVE—
037motor vehicle maintenance and repair; vehicle service stations for refueling and maintenance; strong room maintenance and repair; vehicle cleaning; anti-rust treatment for vehicles; burglar alarm installation and repair; airplane maintenance and repair; vehicle preventative maintenance services, namely, vulcanization of automobile tires, tire installation, mending rubber tire, and retreading of tiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance