Drawing for HEY MAN!

USPTO serial 86193085

HEY MAN!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HEY MAN!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott T. Kannady

SCOTT T. KANNADY BROWN & KANNADY, LLC2000 S COLORADO BLVD STE 2-610DENVER, CO 80222-7936UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Belts; Button down shirts; Chef's coats; Chef's hats; Hats; Jeans; Pants; Polo shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Smocks; T-shirtsACTIVEAug 1, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 17, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2014ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 23, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2014GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2014GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2014EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
May 27, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance