USPTO serial 86193872
PACIFIC NORTHWEST LNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, MELISSA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PACIFIC NORTHWEST LNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Col, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Parrish Lake
CATHERINE PARRISH LAKE STOEL RIVES LLP201 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Liquefied natural gas | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Material handling, namely, extraction of natural gas; equipment facility services ancillary to the operation of natural gas liquefaction facility sites, namely, installation, repair and maintenance of equipment used for natural gas liquefaction and purification facilities operations; infrastructure facility services ancillary to the operation of natural gas liquefaction facility sites, namely, production and extraction of natural gas; repair and maintenance of loading terminal jetty | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Operation of natural gas liquefaction facilities, namely, natural gas inlet in the nature of supply of natural gas; liquefied natural gas storage in the nature of operating storage terminals; liquefied natural gas loading services, namely, transportation and distribution of liquefied natural gas; liquefied natural gas shipping and liquefied natural gas loading port services; public utility services in the nature of natural gas distribution; distribution of liquefied natural gas; infrastructure facility services ancillary to the operation of natural gas liquefaction facility sites, namely, liquefied natural gas storage, transportation and distribution; transport services, namely, the operation of a loading terminal jetty | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Operation of natural gas liquefaction facilities, namely, providing compression, processing, treatment and liquefaction services for natural gas; operation of natural gas liquefaction facilities, namely, natural gas liquefaction and purification facilities and liquefied natural gas inlet in the nature of production of liquefied natural gas; electricity generation; infrastructure facility services ancillary to the operation of natural gas liquefaction facility sites, namely, natural gas liquefaction; services in the natural gas sector, namely, liquefied natural gas production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Northwest LNG Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PACIFIC NORTHWEST LNG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |