USPTO serial 86194035
WEBTECH ANALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBTECH ANALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
TANYA M. REITZEL COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICES1081 CAMBIE STREETVANCOUVER, WEB TECH ANALYTICSBC, V6B5L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that analyzes data collected from GPS-enabled devices that track, monitor and locate vehicles and mobile assets and generates reports of the analysis; computer software that integrates location, usage and diagnostic data from tracked vehicles and tracked mobile assets and generates business intelligence reports to identify patterns and predict trends | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | training in the use of computer software systems in the field of vehicle and mobile asset tracking | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software as a service (SAAS) featuring software that analyzes data collected from GPS-enabled devices that tracks, monitors and locates vehicles and mobile assets and generates reports of the analysis; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software that integrates data from vehicle-based and mobile asset-based tracking and locator devices and data from third party sources to identify patterns, predict trends and generate business intelligence reports; developing software for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and computer software problems; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |