USPTO serial 86196448
EXER-SOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXER-SOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori K. Hall
LORI K. HALL GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPONE MAIN STREET WESTHAMILTON, ON, L8P4Z5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical and scientific research services; scientific testing services, namely, medical testing services; laboratory medical research services; Research relating to medicine, neuroscience, neuropsychology, clinical psychology; Pharmaceutical research and development services; medical services, namely, medical research, medical testing services in the field of research and medical laboratory services; consultancy services relating to medical research and testing, pharmacy and similar fields, namely, medical research and testing; clinical tests on healthy or unhealthy human beings or animals to study the effects of a medicine or a treatment method | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, namely, providing medical services by using purified exercise induced exosomes as a therapy for cancer, diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, dementia, and other aging associated pathologies such as mitochondrial disease, joint/ligament strain/tears, muscle atrophy, muscular dystrophy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |