USPTO serial 86201929
FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION TECHNIQUE (F.I.T.)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION TECHNIQUE (F.I.T.)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
White Plains, GA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | A multi-dimensional educational system that integrates neuro-musculo-skeletal-fascial systems, exercise physiology, ortho/neuro examination/pathology, nutritional examinations and information, and the science described in BioTensegrity, Neuroplasticity and Epigenetics so as to enable heathcare and fitness professionals to provide a tailored exercise and restoration program for an individual; a multi-dimensional educational system taught to practitioners of clinical professional licensure such as chiropractors, physical therapists, rolfers, athletic trainers, acupuncturists, dentists and medical doctors to enhance their specialty by being educated in techniques for evaluating an individual to provide a tailored exercise and restoration program for the individual | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |