USPTO serial 86203535
NEXTNUDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEXTNUDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business information management, namely, electronic reporting of business information, business analytics, namely, business investigations, evaluations, expert appraisals, information and research, trade spend business management | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |