Drawing for DICE RINGS

USPTO serial 86203713

DICE RINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DICE RINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hermine Valizadeh

HERMINE VALIZADEH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Dice, namely, spinner rings which function as dice; Dice games, namely, spinner rings which function as dice gamesACTIVEJul 23, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 1, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 1, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 25, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 18, 2016MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 14, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 12, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 4, 2016MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Feb 4, 2016ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jan 27, 2016RGTTREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jan 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 26, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance