USPTO serial 86206846
OCTOPUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCTOPUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Cadwell
Jeffrey R. Cadwell DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video recordings featuring spinal implant instruction; digital materials, namely, downloadable instruction manuals featuring spinal implants; downloadable documents in the field of spinal and orthopedic surgery provided via a website | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, orthopedic fixation device used in orthopedic transplant and/or implant surgery; medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; medical apparatus, namely, a spinal fusion device; medical devices, namely, spinal implants composed of artificial materials; medical devices, namely, devices for spinal disc repair in the nature of spinal disc implants made from artificial substances; medical devices, namely, devices for spinal disc repair in the nature of an apparatus used in spinal disc repair procedures; medical instruments, namely, orthopedic apparatus and instruments; spinal implants composed of artificial material; surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in spinal and orthopedic surgery; surgical instruments for use in orthopedic and spinal surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, pamphlets, brochures, manuals, books, booklets, leaflets, informational flyers, informational sheets, instructional material, and training material in the field of spinal and orthopedic surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Asfora, Wilson T.
- Other trademarks owned by Asfora, Wilson T.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named OCTOPUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | IULN | ITU LETTER MAILED, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |