USPTO serial 86207841
UCONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UCONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Toms
Keith Toms MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP265 Franklin StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Medical imaging software for an ultrasound apparatus; medical imaging software that controls imaging procedures, records, monitors, displays and analyzes data using an imaging processing system, an electronic display, and an ultrasound imaging probe; computer software for remote diagnosis of medical diagnostic imaging, clinical and biomedical equipment for determining the need for repair; electronic software updates, namely, downloadable computer software and associated data files for updating computer software in the fields of medical imaging, provided via computer and communication networks; computer software for training in the use and operation of a medical imaging apparatus and for providing consultation relating thereto; integrated medical examination systems comprising data processors, electronic displays, and computer software for information management and web-based physical examination and assessment of patients | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical ultrasound apparatus incorporating medical imaging software; ultrasound probes for medical use; integrated medical examination systems comprising data processors, electronic displays, and computer software used in association with medical diagnosis apparatus during the process of web-based diagnosis of a condition in an individual | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |