USPTO serial 86207906
DISHWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DISHWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian L. Saffer
IAN L. SAFFER Swanson & Bratschun, L.L.C.8210 Southpark TerraceLittleton, CO 80120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital video recorders; electronic apparatus and devices for controlling access to pay-television and streaming video services; communications equipment, namely, set-top boxes for receiving video programming; television receivers; satellite receivers; set-top boxes; universal remote controls for home electronic devices, namely, televisions, VCRs, DVD players, digital video recorders, satellite receivers, stereo receivers, and stereo amplifiers; computer hardware and software for streaming audio, video, image and data information to a variety of network devices, namely, personal computers, tablet computers, mobile phones, personal digital assistants (PDA), audio decoders and video decoders; electronic devices, namely, digital media streaming devices; computer software for computer operating hardware, translating digital signals, transmitting digital data and signals, electronic messaging, data management, streaming video, hardware and network security, and access to the internet; computer programs utilizing local communication networks, and wide area communication networks; digital file and data compression software for voice, data, image, graphic, audio, and video transmissions; computer application software for mobile phones and tablet computers, namely, software for treaming audio, video, image and data information to a variety of network devices, namely, personal computers, tablet computers, and mobile devices; communications software, namely, software for residential and commercial audio, video and telephony systems; receivers, modems, routers, digital media hubs, audio and video cabling cables, and adapter plugs, all for residential and commercial audio and visual systems; telecommunications equipment, namely, smartphones, wireless and mobile telephones for voice, data, image, graphic, audio, video and electronic mail; hand-held devices for wireless access to global communications networks, namely, laptop computers, tablet computers, and personal digital assistants (PDA); PC tablets, personal digital assistants, telephones, telephone modems and radio modems | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcasting, webcasting, streaming, and transmission of audio, video, subscription television, and video-on-demand content via the internet and electronic communications networks; television broadcasting to mobile devices, namely mobile phones, smartphones, laptops, and tablet computers; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, graphics, audio, video, and multimedia by means of wired and wireless networks; wireless telephone and digital messaging services; internet service provider services; providing access to a global computer network for internet browsing and messaging through a mobile device; providing an online forum for sharing ratings, reviews, recommendations, promotional information, and scheduling information for movies, series, television programs, webcasts, on-demand content, events, and activities in the field of entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of non-downloadable movies and television programs via a video-on demand service; entertainment services in the nature of providing non-downloadable entertainment content via the Internet and electronic communications networks, namely, movies, television series, and television programs, and video clips in the fields of comedy, drama, action, adventure, sports, musicals, current events, entertainment news, documentaries, and animation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable cloud computing software for uploading, downloading, storing, streaming, and viewing movies, television series, television programs, music, periodicals, and books | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DISH Digital L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SLING TV L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DISHWORLD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |