USPTO serial 86209949
CDI SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CDI SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter J. Tencza Jr.
WALTER J. TENCZA JR. WALTER J. TENCZA JR.100 MENLO PARK STE 210EDISON, NJ 08837-2428UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Services including providing Internet/web based computer software providing clinical documentation program workflow, monitoring and a reference tool. Providing proprietary computer software that is internet/web based that meets the specialized needs of a robust clinical documentation information program while assuring HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) compliance standards are maintained. Internet/web based computer software that helps healthcare providers meet the clinical documentation requirements under ICD-10 (ICD-10 is the tenth revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) by guiding them through the steps required. Goods including such aforementioned computer software. Services including providing Internet/web based computer software which automates, streamlines and integrates key clinical documentation program processes. Providing Internet/web based computer software that organizes tasks associated with assignments, chart reviews and clinical documentation specialists workflow processes, organizes, tracks and supports all aspects of query templates, generation and response, facilitates the capture of DRG (diagnosis related group) assignment for the MS (Medicare Severity), AP (All Patient) and APR (All patient refined) -DRG systems, organizes and streamlines the DRG reconciliation process, provides robust report functionality to monitor program performance metrics, trends and identification of potential program opportunities, provides guidelines for clinical documentation needs of the healthcare provider under the new coding system of ICD-10. Goods including such aforementioned computer software | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |