USPTO serial 86211126
CONTRA PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTRA PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor K. Sapphire, Esq.
VICTOR K SAPPHIRE MICHELMAN & ROBINSON LLP10880 WILSHIRE BL19TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FRAGRANCES, PERFUMES; NON-MEDICATED HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS AND NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS; BODY LOTIONS AND HAIR LOTIONS; BODY OILS AND HAIR OILS; SOAPS, SHAMPOOS; ESSENTIAL OILS, COSMETICS, BATH GEL; AND BREATH FRESHENING CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, BREATH MINTS, GUM | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | JEWELRY; KEYCHAINS AS JEWELRY TRINKETS AND FOBS; WATCHES; RUBBER OR SILICONE WRISTBANDS IN THE NATURE OF A BRACELET | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, BAGS, PURSES, WALLETS; BAGS, NAMELY, CARRY-ALL BAGS, KNAPSACKS; TRAVEL BAGGAGE, LUGGAGE, BACKPACKS, PURSES, WALLETS, SHOULDER BAGS, KNAPSACKS, HANDBAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | LIQUOR; MALT BEVERAGES, NAMELY, flavored brewed malt beverages; SPIRITS; WINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |