Drawing for BREWER STEEL

USPTO serial 86211505

BREWER STEEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREWER STEEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert N. Cook

ROBERT N. COOK WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK, P.C.11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190-5244UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 12, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 26, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 11, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 11, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance