Drawing for ALL ABOARD SCHOOL BUS

USPTO serial 86211542

ALL ABOARD SCHOOL BUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL ABOARD SCHOOL BUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry Miller

LARRY MILLER FEDER KASZOVITZ LLP845 3RD AVE FL 11NEW YORK, NY 10022-6601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys, games and playthings, namely, inflatable children's play structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 27, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 18, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 18, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 22, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 2, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 2, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance