USPTO serial 86211575
WHAT A STORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHAT A STORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Mitchell
CHRISTOPHER A. MITCHELL DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC350 S MAIN STSTE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104-2131Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |