Drawing for FRISK

USPTO serial 86212069

FRISK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRISK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick M. Flaherty

Patrick M. Flaherty Verizon Trademark Services LLC1320 North Court House Road, 9th FloorArlington, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless communications devices, namely, mobile phones and tablet computers; gesture recognition software for the sharing of voice, images and dataACTIVE—
038Wireless communications services, namely, transmission of voice, images and data to mobile devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 5, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 1, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 4, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 4, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance