Drawing for DIGITAL BOOTH

USPTO serial 86212977

DIGITAL BOOTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL BOOTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J Kolegraff

18101 VON KARMAN AVESTE 230IRVINE, CA 92612-7132

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal phone boothsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 27, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 1, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 1, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 1, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance