Drawing for A ASICS

USPTO serial 86213120

A ASICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A ASICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn Scanlon Hernandez

Lynn Scanlon Hernandez ASICS Corporation80 Technology DriveIrvine, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ear plugs for divers; measuring machines, namely, coordinate measuring machines; testing machines, namely, textile testing machines; measuring and testing instruments, namely, measuring apparatus for fitting footwear, instruments for measuring length, instruments for detecting and measuring two-dimensional distribution of force and pressure; cell phone straps; cases for cell phones; cell phone covers; cell phone holders; computer programs for measuring and analyzing foot measurements for custom-fitted footwear; spectacles; goggles for sports; sunglasses; swimming goggles; spectacle cases; protective helmetsACTIVE—
024Fabrics for the manufacture of clothing and footwear; textile material for the manufacture of clothing and footwear; knitted fabric for the manufacture of clothing; fabrics for textile use; elastic woven fabrics for clothing; non-woven textile fabrics; handkerchiefs of textile; towels of textile; face towels of textile; handkerchiefs of textileACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 22, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 11, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 18, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 18, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 18, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance