USPTO serial 86214323
THE CHILD WHISPERER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CHILD WHISPERER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant R. Clayton
GRANT R. CLAYTON CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON, P.C.PO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091-1909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio and video recordings featuring information in any one or more of the following fields, mental health and wellness, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Computer programs for use in teaching, instructing, advising, and consulting in any one or more of the following fields, mental health and wellness, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Electrical devices, namely, blank semi-conductor and computer storage devices; Electrical devices, namely, pre-recorded semi-conductor and computer storage devices featuring multi-media files containing text featuring information in any one or more of the following fields, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Electrical devices, namely, pre-recorded semi-conductor and computer storage devices featuring multi-media files containing audio featuring information in any one or more of the following fields, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Electrical devices, namely, pre-recorded semi-conductor and computer storage devices featuring multi-media files containing video featuring information in any one or more of the following fields, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Downloadable multi-media files containing text in any one or more of the following fields, mental health and wellness, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Downloadable multi-media files containing audio in any one or more of the following fields, mental health and wellness, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Downloadable multi-media files containing video featuring information in any one or more of the following fields, mental health and wellness, parenting, education of parents about parenting, and advice for parents on nurturing and on assessing personality and character types; Eyewear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |