USPTO serial 86214637
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TSAT TSZ MUI, HK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary J. Nelson
GARY J. NELSON CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS); HOSTING OF WEBSITES, DATABASES, WEBLOGS (BLOGS) AND SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE; WEB PORTAL DESIGN; ONLINE PROVISION OF WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS; CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE INCLUDING ONLINE SUPPORT SERVICES; PROVISION OF WEB SERVERS AND WEB SERVER SPACE; STORAGE, MAINTENANCE AND BACK UP OF DATA CONTAINED ON WEB SERVERS; ELECTRONIC DATA STORAGE; DEVELOPMENT AND PROVISION OF SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF DATA; DESIGNING, DEVELOPING, CUSTOMISING AND MAINTAINING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN RELATION TO THE AFOREMENTIONED SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION, INCLUDING ONLINE ABOUT THE AFOREMENTIONED SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |