CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ABK

USPTO serial 86215672

ABK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ABK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia K. Sutherland

JULIA K. SUTHERLAND SEYFARTH SHAW LLP131 S DEARBORN ST STE 2400CHICAGO, IL 60603-5863UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Bicycle tool boxes of metal; Bicycle locksACTIVE—
008Bicycle tools, namely, wrenches; Bicycle hand tools, namely, tire levers and bicycle chain toolsACTIVE—
009Bicycle computers; Bicycle helmets; Bicycle tools, namely, tire pressure gauges and tire tread depth gaugesACTIVE—
011Bicycle lights; bicycle reflectorsACTIVE—
012Bicycle structural parts; Bicycle patch kits comprising tire patches and patches for repairing inner tubes of tires; Bicycle mirrors; Bicycle saddle bags; Bicycle handlebar grips; Bicycle bells; Bicycle horns; Bicycle storage bags, namely, pannier bags; Bicycle storage baskets, namely, storage baskets adapted for bicycles; Bicycle wheel stands; Bicycle work stands; Bicycle tires; Bicycle pumps; Bicycle racks for vehicles; Bicycle protective padding, namely, safety pads for bicyclesACTIVE—
020Bicycle tool boxes not of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 1, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 30, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance