USPTO serial 86216165
NO-NUTSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO-NUTSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
DEBORAH J. PECKHAM BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER ST STE 800BOSTON, MA 02110-1624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Sandwich spreads, namely, cheese spreads, dairy-based spreads, fruit spreads, fruit-based spreads, garlic-based spread, hazelnut spread, jellies, legume-based spreads, lemon spread, meat-based spreads, nut-based spread, and vegetable-based spreads; Snack foods, namely, animal fat-based snack foods, bean-based snack foods, dairy-based snack foods, fruit and soy based snack food, fruit-based snack food, insect-based snack foods, laver-based snack foods, meat-based snack foods, nut-based snack foods, potato-based snack foods, seed-based snack foods, snack food dips, soy-based snack foods, and vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Breakfast cereals; sandwich spreads, namely, mayonnaise, chocolate-based spread, cocoa spreads, and spreads consisting primarily of emulsified biscuits or cookies; snack foods, namely, cereal based snack food, coffee-based snack foods, chocolate, corn-based snack foods, grain-based snack foods, multigrain-based snack foods, processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods, quinoa-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, chocolate-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GreenField Specialty Alcohols Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NO-NUTSENSE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |