USPTO serial 86216531
GLICO A WHOLESOME LIFE IN THE BEST OF TASTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLICO A WHOLESOME LIFE IN THE BEST OF TASTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Starch for industrial purposes; modified starch for industrial purposes; gluten for the food industry; wheat gluten for the food industry; vital wheat gluten for the food industry; gluten for industrial purposes; wheat gluten for industrial purposes; vital wheat gluten for industrial purposes; wheat proteins for use in the manufacture of foods; dextrin; phosphorylated oligosaccharide preparations for use in the manufacture of tooth paste, cosmetics, flavorings and foodstuffs other than for medical use; calcium phosphate; calcium salts; glycogen; oligosaccharide preparations for use in the manufacture of tooth paste, cosmetics, flavorings and foodstuffs other than for medical use; flour for industrial purposes; potato flour for industrial purposes; tapioca flour for industrial purposes; chemicals for use in industry, namely, food industry; industrial chemicals; artificial sweeteners; glucose for the food industry; protein for industrial use; lactose for the food industry; meat tenderizers for industrial purposes; oils for the preservation of food; pectin for the food industry; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Starch for use in manufacturing food; modified starch for manufacturing food; food additives for non-industrial use, namely, gluten, wheat gluten, and vital wheat gluten for food; gluten prepared as foodstuff; wheat protein; oligosaccharide as food additive; farinaceous foods; potato flour; thickening agents for use in cooking foodstuffs; instant rice; flour; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; cereal bars; rice-based snack food; cereal products, namely, cereal based chips and snack foods; noodles; noodle-based prepared meals; natural sweeteners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GLICO A WHOLESOME LIFE IN THE BEST OF TASTE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |