USPTO serial 86217300
SWIMSWIMSWIM.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWIMSWIMSWIM.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Michael Bean
D. MICHAEL BEAN BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 High StreetBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Swimming products and equipment, namely, swimsuits, goggles, training equipment, kick boards, aqua fitness equipment, water polo equipment, bathing caps, shorts, t-shirts, sandals, headwear, lifeguard clothing, sports bags, rash guards, and swimming aids | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line sales and distribution of swimming products and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |