USPTO serial 86217523
DIGITAL CHURCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4953219Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2016
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIGITAL CHURCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HESLINGTON, YORK YO10 5ZD, GB
HESLINGTON, YORK YO10 5ZD, GB
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Giovanna H. Fessenden
GIOVANNA H. FESSENDEN HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.530 VIRGINIA ROAD, P.O. BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Streaming and electronic transmissions of video material over digital networks, or via the internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 22, 2014 |
| 042 | Providing an online non-downloadable internet based system application for processing videos, namely, for the management, selection, sharing, storing, creation and viewing of videos; Providing computer services for the management of videos, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for uploading, exchanging, and sharing of videos in a computer network; providing a website featuring technology that enables internet users to share, manage and view videos; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms, namely, for use in the management, control, viewing and selection of videos; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in the management, control, selection and viewing of videos of religious matters; software as a services (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the control, selection, viewing and management of video content with a religious subject matter; technical support services, namely, support technical services relating to troubleshooting of computer software problems relating to the management of videos in a computer network; creating and maintaining blogs and online journals for others; providing customised online webpages and data feeds featuring user defined information including blog posts, new media content, online journals, other online content and online weblinks to other websites; providing technology consulting in the field of social media; consulting services in the field of providing online non-downloadable software applications; developing customized web pages and other data feed formats featuring user-defined information in the field of religion; platform as a service (PAAS) providing computer software platforms, namely, for live video steaming, set-top boxes, electronic programming guides, graphic design, webpages and social media; computer programming, namely, software design and development and computer system design and development for the management, control, viewing and selection of videos provided by others; providing software, namely, software as a service (SAAS) services for creation and publication of online journals and blogs and the use of videos on such platforms; computer services for religious entities and organizations, namely, software design, software development, computer system design, and computer system development relating to the management, control, viewing and selection of videos that are provided by the religious entities and organizations; providing a web hosting platform for the creation and publication of online social media and websites, including videos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 22, 2014 |
| 045 | Providing, for broadcasting entities and organizations, on-line social networking services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 22, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PIKSEL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PIKSEL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Piskel, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DIGITAL CHURCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 3, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |