USPTO serial 86218018
LIPTON ICE TEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIPTON ICE TEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
LISA W. ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP452 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10018-2706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea; tea extracts; carbonated and non carbonated tea based beverages; iced tea; tea and iced tea mix powders; non medicinal herbal tea and infusions; iced beverages, namely, iced tea based beverages containing tea and/or tea extracts; slush and ice confections, namely, edible ices, frozen ices; ice cream; sorbets; frozen confectionery | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, non-alcoholic drinks with tea flavor; flavoured water; carbonated and non carbonated non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavour; fruit drinks and fruit juices; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; iced beverages, namely, iced fruit beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |