Drawing for ASSUMPTIONS SUCK

USPTO serial 86218388

ASSUMPTIONS SUCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSUMPTIONS SUCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth M. Kwartler

KENNETH M. KWARTLER KEN KWARTLER LAW OFFICE5300 MEADOWS RD STE 200LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035-8225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035market research and analysis services, namely, the provision of on-line and social media monitoring and analysis services; consulting services in the field of on-line and social media monitoring and analysis for business or commercial purposes; business management services, namely, providing information, data asset and brand and identity management services; providing business information services in the fields of brand measurement, advertising effectiveness and public opinion monitoring; providing business information in the field of on-line and social mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 11, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 23, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 23, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 11, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance