Drawing for SOLID SELECT

USPTO serial 86218698

SOLID SELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLID SELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

WILLIAM J. SEITER SEITER LEGAL STUDIO2500 BROADWAY BLDG FSANTA MONICA, CA 90404-3065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Processed timber products and lumber, namely, building, manufactured, better, shop, cutting grade, sawn, worked, semi-worked, rough-sawn, gauged, treated, and dried timber; wood veneer, plywood and laminated wood; building materials incorporating timber, namely, ceiling panels, floor panels, shaped timber, wood paneling, wood trim, wallboards, fingerjoint studs, baseboard, skirting board, wood siding, patterned wood siding, wood stiles, wood moldingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 15, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 15, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 23, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 27, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 30, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 29, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 29, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance