USPTO serial 86220431
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Oakville, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
Maria v. Hardison Tassan & Hardison4143 27th Street N.Arlington, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books of general human interest and books in the field of social insight, social commentary, and wisdom; stationery, namely, pens, writing paper, and notepads; greeting cards and posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, and hats | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting business conferences, educational conferences, motivational conferences and social entertainment events; rental of advertising space on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, a continuing television news show broadcast over the internet and television, and a continuing radio show broadcast over the internet and radio; educational services, namely, conducting conferences and seminars in the field of knowledge management; providing motivational speaking services in the field of self and personal improvement; providing an educational website that gives computer users the ability to upload and share user-generated videos, essays and articles on a wide variety of topics and subjects; book publishing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |