USPTO serial 86220915
EFFECTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS OBSERVATION TOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2016
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EFFECTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS OBSERVATION TOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*
Plus Government fees of $3,400
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ALPHARETTA, GA, US
Alpharetta, GA, US
Alpharetta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles G. Zug
Charles G. Zug NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 S. College StreetSuite 2300, IP DepartmentCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for data entry, storage, and analysis, for use in the field of education for documenting classroom observations in an educational organization or program, and for evaluating the effectiveness and quality of an educational learning environment; Downloadable electronic publication in the nature of an assessment form used by others in the field of education for documenting classroom observations in an educational organization or program and for evaluating the effectiveness and quality of an educational learning environment | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2015 |
| 016 | Printed publication in the nature of an assessment form used by others in the field of education for documenting classroom observations in an educational organization or program and for evaluating the effectiveness and quality of an educational learning environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Consultation in the field of educational systems for the purpose of improving education organizations and programs; Educational services, namely, providing training in the field of classroom observation for use in evaluating the effectiveness and quality of an educational learning environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing non-downloadable computer software for data entry, storage, and analysis, for use in the field of education for documenting classroom observations in an education organization or program and for evaluating the effectiveness and quality of an educational learning environment; Accreditation services, namely, providing quality assurance services in the field of education by evaluating education organizations and observing classroom operation to evaluate the effectiveness and quality of the organization | ACTIVE | Aug 27, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COGNIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Education, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Education, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EFFECTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS OBSERVATION TOOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |