USPTO serial 86221850
KLEANWIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLEANWIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HSINCHU CITY 30077, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR TRANSMITTING AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TRANSMITTING AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR TRANSMITTING AUDIO, VIDEO AND DATA FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; INTERFACES FOR COMPUTERS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; COMPUTER NETWORK CARD FOR CONNECTING PORTABLE COMPUTER DEVICES TO COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; WIRELESS DATA TRANSMISSION AND COMMUNICATION CHIP FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; CIRCUIT BOARD FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; INTERFACE CARD FOR DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT IN THE FORM OF COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; SEMICONDUCTORS COMPONENT FOR DATA TRANSMISSION AND COMMUNICATION FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; VERY LARGE SCALE INTEGRATION MICROCHIPS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT BOARD FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS; LARGE SCALE INTEGRATION MICROCHIPS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |