USPTO serial 86221982
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Chalfie
EDWARD J. CHALFIE DENNEMEYER & ASSOCIATES LLC181 West Madison St.Suite 4500CHICAGO, IL 60602| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Advertising display apparatus, namely, rotatory LED projectors with electronic support for text and graphic data; advertising display apparatus, namely, LED light image projector; audiovisual equipment for advertising displays, namely, rotary support arm specially adapted for use with digital image visualizer apparatus for reproduction of sound and graphics; sound and image projectors, LED screen with 360º display, apparatus for reproduction of images with holographic effect; fiber optic panels for advertising displays, namely, projectors and posters in the nature of a flat panel display screen illuminated by fiber optics; fiber optic illuminating and signaling units for advertising displays; fiber optic illuminating and signaling systems for advertising displays comprising LED panel displays; programmable telecommunications apparatus, namely, gateways; microprocessors, telephone apparatus, micro personal computers with or without memory card readers; antennas for wireless communications apparatus; battery plates for wireless communications apparatus, all for use with advertising displays | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Provision of advertising space, time and media, namely, rental and sales services of specific physical space for the reproduction of advertising material; rental of advertising time on communication media | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of advertising material to advertising display devices; rental of telecommunication equipment for sending and receiving digital files for use with advertising display devices; automated electronic message sending services for use with advertising display devices; rental of cordless communication devices for use with advertising display devices; digital network telecommunications services for use with advertising display devices; rental of telecommunication equipment in the nature of routers and complementary connection devices for use with advertising display devices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |