USPTO serial 86222715
ALLOTSPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLOTSPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dania Beach, FL
Dania Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver A. Ruiz
OLIVER A. RUIZ MALLOY & MALLOY, P.L.2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for a news aggregation site that allows the user to view existing feeds from newspapers and online publications and then assemble the information to create user-specific newspapers or reports; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for platforms that enable Internet users to create, upload, bookmark, view, annotate, and share data, information and multimedia content; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for an online community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking services in the field of general interest; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, sharing and transmitting messages, comments, multimedia content, photos, pictures, images, text, information, and other user-generated content. Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for the purpose of facilitating e-commerce; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for technology that enables users to vote and rate the importance of news and current event items | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |