Drawing for WILBUR THE COYOTE

USPTO serial 86222781

WILBUR THE COYOTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WILBUR THE COYOTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex S. Halbach

ALEX S. HALBACH CUTLER & DONAHOE, LLP100 N PHILLIPS AVE FL 9SIOUX FALLS, SD 57104-6715UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesACTIVEJul 1, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 22, 2017INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 15, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 15, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 15, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 15, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 5, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 13, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 27, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance