Drawing for P PHI

USPTO serial 86224053

P PHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P PHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Hynak

MICHAEL J. HYNAK HYNAK & ASSOCIATES PC812 S COURTHOUSE RDARLINGTON, VA 22204-2105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Olive oilACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 23, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 23, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance