Drawing for FASHION KITCHEN

USPTO serial 86224331

FASHION KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASHION KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas D. Churovich

DOUGLAS D. CHUROVICH POLSTER LIEDER12412 POWERSCOURT DR STE 200SAINT LOUIS, MO 63131-3615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for use while cooking, namely, aprons, hats, blouses, shirts, pants, slacks, skirts, and dressesACTIVE—
041Entertainment in the nature of an ongoing special variety show featuring cooking and fashion broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing lectures and presentations in the field of cooking and fashion, and distributing course materials in connection therewith; Providing non-downloadable on-line videos featuring cooking and fashion instruction and information; Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction, including online instruction, in the fields of culinary arts and apparel philosophy, namely, the preparation, cooking and eating of foods, and the use of certain apparel in association with such activitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 25, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance