USPTO serial 86224481
4MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 4MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Navid Fanaeian
NAVID FANAEIAN DEWITT ROSS & STEVENS S.C.2 E MIFFLIN ST STE 600MADISON, WI 53703-2865UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wearable motion sensors that measure biomechanics during exercise and communicate measurements to mobile electronic devices and personal computers capable of evaluating form and technique, assessing performance, and providing exercise feedback via software applications; motion sensors for use in detecting and analyzing three dimensional movements over time to track exercise activity and progress, communicate detected data to mobile electronic devices and personal computers that provide exercise feedback via software applications, store historical performance data on a cloud network, and provide comparisons of performance relative to other athletes to motivate users to exercise; electronic motion sensors for detecting and analyzing movements during exercise and wirelessly communicating data on movements to mobile electronic devices and personal computers to identify risk of injury, detect musculoskeletal imbalances during exercise, and provide real-time fitness coaching through software applications; wearable motion sensors with video cameras that record and measure performance during exercise and communicate data to mobile electronic devices and personal computers that provide a user with exercise feedback via software applications; motion sensors for use in attachment to clothing for detecting and analyzing three dimensional movements over time to track exercise activity and progress, communicate detected data to mobile electronic devices and personal computers that provide exercise feedback via software applications, store historical performance data on a cloud network, and provide comparisons of performance relative to other athletes to motivate users to exercise; electronic motion sensors for use in attachment to clothing for detecting and analyzing movements during exercise and wirelessly communicating data on movements to mobile electronic devices and personal computers to identify risk of injury, detect musculoskeletal imbalances during exercise, and provide real-time fitness coaching through software applications; all of the foregoing being sensors for use in measuring fitness and not for medical use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2015 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |