Drawing for YUNI SEEKERS OF GOOD

USPTO serial 86225035

YUNI SEEKERS OF GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YUNI SEEKERS OF GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Mizrahi

MARK B. MIZRAHI WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD FL 9LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1582UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003lip balm, soaps for personal use; massage oil; face relaxer spray, and face primer; hair styling aids in the nature of hair styling preparations; eye cream, sun block, personal deodorant; room fragrances; aromatic facial hydrating facial and body sprays; non-medicated mouth wash; inhaler filled with essential oils for use in aromatherapy and not for medical or therapeutic useACTIVE—
005nutritional supplements; hand sanitizerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 28, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 16, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 16, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 30, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 30, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 3, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance