USPTO serial 86226595
TIME LAPSE READER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIME LAPSE READER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Martinsried (München), DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Wessel
JACK WESSEL DAY PITNEY LLP1 INTERNATIONAL PL FL 16BOSTON, MA 02110-3179UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DNA chips for DNA analysis; scientific apparatus and instruments for measuring relative DNA and protein parts and fittings therefore; scientific apparatus and instruments for detecting the genetic sequences and genetic modifications; Scientific imaging apparatus and instruments for the use in the study of proteins and drug developments; apparatus for laboratory use, namely, cell culture and analysis dishes; microplates for cell culture and analysis, chambers for cell culture and analysis, heating and incubation systems for cell culture and analysis, humidifying chambers for cell culture and analysis, cell culture and analysis racks; laboratory devices, namely, electric cell substrate impedance sensing devices to monitor living cells; apparatus and instruments for microscopy, namely, anti-vibration automated tables for microscopy, micromanipulators devices used to interact with a sample under a microscope, cross tables for microscopy for positioning samples under microscopes, cross tables for microscopy with piezo actuators for positioning samples under microscopes; Apparatus and instruments for imaging biological samples such as partical, molecules, cells, cell assemblies, tissue slices and animals for laboratory use; Apparatus and instruments for the analysis of biomolecular structure, function and interactions of nucleic acids, peptides, proteins, proteoglycan, sugars and small anorganic molecules for laboratory use; Apparatus and instruments for DNA analysis for laboratory use; Apparatus and instruments for genetic analysis for laboratory use; Apparatus and instruments for protein analysis for laboratory use; Apparatus and instruments for cell analysis for laboratory use; Apparatus and instruments for diagnosis and analysis in the biochemical and biophysical sector, for laboratory use; Apparatus and instruments for microscopy, Automated tables for microscopy, micromanipulators, cross tables for microscopy, cross tables for microscopy with piezo actuators; Biochips, in particular biochips of plastic and compound materials, for research and scientific purposes; Substrates and chips with microchannels, microchambers and/or microflow chambers, for research and scientific purposes; Cell culture chambers, for research and scientific purposes; Cell culture chambers for the use of microscopy and analysis of biological samples such as particle biomolecules, cells, cellular assemblies, tissue-slides, bulk tissue, organisms and animals; Microscopes, Polarizing microscopes, Fluorescence microscopes, Automated microscopes, Microscopes without eyepieces, microscopes with integrated incubation; Microscope objectives, microscope eye pieces, optical mirrors, microscope lenses, microscope lenses of plastic, reader software for interpreting microscope raw image data, activation software for microscopes to control device operation, for scientific, research, development, and laboratory use; Microscope holders, Microscope slides, In particular biochips, Integrated analysis chips, substrates, Chips with microchannels, microchambers and/or microflow chambers for microscopy for the use of microscopy and analysis of biological samples such as particle biomolecules, cells, cellular assemblies, tissue-slides, bulk tissue, organisms and animals; Fluorescence detectors, for scientific, non-medical use; Fluorescence filters, shutters, Lasers, Laser filters, for scientific, non-medical use; Optical lamps, LEDs | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Halogen lamps, mercury vapour lamps, xenon lamps, ultraviolet lamps, infrared lamps for fluorescence detectors all of the foregoing goods for medical purposes; Cell culture apparatus for medical use, namely, cell culture chambers; Apparatus and instruments for imaging biological samples such as partical, molecules, cells, cell assemblies, tissue slices and animals for medical use; Apparatus and instruments for the analysis of biomolecular structure, function and interactions of nucleic acids, peptides, proteins, proteoglycan, sugars and small anorganic molecules for medical use; Apparatus and instruments for DNA analysis for medical use; Apparatus and instruments for genetic analysis for medical use; Apparatus and instruments for protein analysis for medical use; Apparatus and instruments for cell analysis for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Halogen lamps, mercury vapour lamps, xenon lamps, ultraviolet lamps, infrared lamps for fluorescence detectors, not for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |