CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PACIFICO CLARA CERVEZA

USPTO serial 86226838

PACIFICO CLARA CERVEZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACIFICO CLARA CERVEZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ricardo Fischer

Ricardo Fischer Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 South Wacker DriveSuite 8000Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, sweatshirts, T-shirts, golf and tennis shirts, jackets, hats, caps, sun visors, socks, shorts; sportswear, namely, bathing suitsACTIVE—
026Cloth patches for clothing; embroidered patches for clothing; ornamental cloth patches; patches for clothing made of rubber, plastic and vinylACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 27, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 20, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 20, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 15, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 26, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance