Drawing for HUMANISTIC COACH - IHCOS

USPTO serial 86227830

HUMANISTIC COACH - IHCOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUMANISTIC COACH - IHCOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Smedley

JAMES M. SMEDLEY JAMES M SMEDLEY LLC776 MOUNTAIN BLVD STE 105WATCHUNG, NJ 07069-6269UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, developing, arranging and conducting classes, seminars, conferences, courses, workshops, programs webinars and tutorial sessions in the fields of corporate management, leadership, career development, achievement of objectives, communication, conflict management, self-management, self-development, life planning, life design, partnership and family; providing of training in the area of corporate management, leadership, career development, achievement of objectives, communication, conflict management, self-management, self-development, life planning, life design, partnership and family; providing an online computer information database in the fields of life coaching and personal coaching in the field of human resources containing information about coaching, coaching tools and best practicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance