USPTO serial 86228136
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
Milena S. Mishev Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP100 Matawan RoadSuite 120Matawan, NJ 07747| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications software for remote control and operation of lighting, heating, air-conditioning, premises access control, automatic blinds, shutters, awnings, blinds, shutters and screens, household appliances, alarm systems, audio-video devices, sports and recreational equipment; electric sensors; electronic sensors for use in the operation of wireless devices, namely, smart phones, tablets and portable computers, radio communication modules, communication devices and drivers for remote control; electric plugs, electronic sensors and universal module circuits used in household electric appliances, namely, electric kettles, coffee machines, electric coffee filters, filters for drinking water, air filters for air conditioning, cookers, microwave ovens, lamps, light bulbs, refrigerators, heaters, air conditioning, heating panels, a heating plates, dryers, toasters | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Light emitting diode (LED) bulbs; electric plugs, sensors and universal modules circuits sold as integral component of household electric appliances, namely, electric kettles, electric coffee machines, non-paper electric coffee filters, filters for drinking water, air filters for air conditioning units, electric bread cookers, electric egg cookers, electric pressure cookers, electric rice cookers, electric slow cookers, microwave ovens, lamps, light bulbs, refrigerators, electric space heaters, air conditioning units, heating panels and plates used for indoor heating purposes, clothes dryers, electric toasters | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software design and development; Design, development, installation, maintenance and repair of communication software for remote control of lighting, heating, air-conditioning, access control, work automatic blinds, shutters, awnings, blinds, shutters and screens, home appliances, security systems, devices audio-video devices, sports and leisure, sensors and sensors using wireless devices including mobile devices, namely, smart phones, tablets or laptops; Computer software development in the field of mobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |