USPTO serial 86228984
NON GMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NON GMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace Han Stanton
GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Baking mixes; mixes for bakery goods and bakery desserts; prepared biscuit mixes; prepared breading mixes; gingerbread mixes; cornbread mixes; focaccia bread mixes; mixes for dinner rolls, sweet rolls, and cinnamon rolls; cake mixes; mixes for dessert goods, namely, dessert bars, dessert crisps, cobblers, and donuts; prepared crepe mixes; muffin mixes; brownie, cake and cookie mixes; pancake and waffle mixes; waffle cone mixes, scone and shortcake mixes; bread mixes; pie crust mixes; frosting and streusel topping mixes; mixes for making baking batters; flour; baking batter mixes; waffle cone mixes; prepared frosting and streusel topping mixes; icing; icing mixes; marinades; gravy mixes; tempura mixes and batters; mixes for making batters for fried foods; breadcrumbs; seasoned coating mix for seafood, poultry and meat; ready-to-eat cereals; Organic and non-organic foods, namely, processed cereals, ready to eat cereal, prepackaged rice and crackers; granola based snack bars, cereal-derived food bars, and prepackaged pasta; Corn meal; grits; hominy grits; Wheat germ for human consumption; flaxseed for human consumption; processed bran; granola; frozen pancakes; frozen French toast; frozen waffles; prepackaged pasta; sauces, namely, salad dressings, barbeque sauces, tomato sauces, pasta sauces and spaghetti sauces; corn chips; corn tortilla chips; corn chips containing whole grains, seeds, and dehydrated vegetables; quinoa chips; prepackaged brown rice; prepackaged couscous mix, consisting primarily of couscous, dried pasta, and also including processed garbanzo beans and quinoa; prepackaged, unpopped popcorn kernels; cocoa beverage mixes; chocolates, candies and confectionery items, namely, confectionery made of sugar, chocolate confections, namely, chocolate-covered fruits and nuts, peanut butter confectionery chips, coconut flavored confectionary chips, Greek yogurt flavored confectionary chips, and yogurt confections, namely, yogurt-covered fruits, nuts and pretzels; chocolate-based snack clusters including fruit, nuts, graham crackers, marshmallows and/or candies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |