USPTO serial 86228999
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Las Vegas, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mona Qureshi-Hart
MONA QURESHI-HART HART IP LAW & STRATEGIES LLCP.O. Box 18919GOLDEN, CO 80402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All-purpose carrying bags; Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets and handbags; Book bags; Briefcases and attache cases; Carry-all bags; Change purses; Clutch bags; Clutch purses; Duffle bags; Evening handbags; Fashion handbags; Handbags; Handbags, purses and wallets; Leather bags and wallets; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather handbags; Leather purses; Luggage; Messenger bags; Overnight bags; Pocketbooks; Purses and wallets; Shoulder bags; Small bags for men; Tote bags; Travel bags; Wallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Belts; Belts for clothing; Belts made of leather; Belts of textile; Blouses; Boots; Coats; Jackets; Jeans; Leather belts; Pants; Shirts; Shoes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |