USPTO serial 86229066
LIVE CREDIT CONFIDENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVE CREDIT CONFIDENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Rynkiewicz
JOHN P. RYNKIEWICZ Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP601 Massachusetts Ave., NWWashington, DC 20001-3743UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Monitoring consumer credit reports and scores and providing an alert as to any changes therein for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial information provided by electronic means; providing information in the field of credit; providing an on-line computer database in the field of financial information related to credit reporting, credit rating, credit scores, and credit disputes; providing on-line financial calculators and credit score analyzer; fraud reimbursement services in the field of credit cards purchases against liability for unauthorized charges; reimbursement services in the nature of fraud reimbursement in the field of credit and debit card purchases and ATM uses; credit, debit and ATM card verification services; financial information and credit repair and recovery caused as a result of fraud | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consultation in the field of data and identity theft; Financial identity monitoring services for fraud protection purposes; Providing consumer credit report monitoring information to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud via the internet; monitoring consumer credit reports and scores and providing an alert as to any changes therein to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; identity theft protection services; lost, misplaced and stolen credit, debit and ATM card notification services, namely, providing notifications to individuals of a changed status or condition in the use of lost, misplaced and stolen credit, debit and ATM card for fraud prevention purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ConsumerInfo.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ConsumerInfo.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named LIVE CREDIT CONFIDENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |