Drawing for ALL THINGS LADDERLESS

USPTO serial 86229769

ALL THINGS LADDERLESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL THINGS LADDERLESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. White

THOMAS P. WHITE SCHIFF HARDIN LLPPO BOX 6079CHICAGO, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal poles, mounting plates, and hanging apparatus, namely, hooks, clips, rings, cables and chains, all for use in mounting signs and displaysACTIVE—
020Mounting systems made primarily of non-metal for mounting signs and displays comprising poles, grippers, mounting channels, mounting plates, and hanging apparatus, namely, hooks, clips, rings, cables and/or chains; non-metal grippers, mounting channels, and hanging apparatus, namely, hooks, clips, and rings, all for use in mounting signs and displaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 16, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 31, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 31, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 25, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance